From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147F61FF0C1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:03:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9C41C21348; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <792a093e-1f8b-4066-b6ec-f98f3cf3d292@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:03:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH access-control] rpc: do not check malformed acl path To: Elias Huhsovitz , d.csapak@proxmox.com References: <8eff67e8-ac88-4b7d-a90d-de32644d1d95@proxmox.com> <20260826103752.115037-1-e.huhsovitz@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1787749425107 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.794 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: HUWBEQU2U6TCKEANGTTGIPVYMVR7WRHP X-Message-ID-Hash: HUWBEQU2U6TCKEANGTTGIPVYMVR7WRHP X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 26.08.26 um 2:53 PM schrieb Elias Huhsovitz: > Thanks for the quick response! > > This was intended as a repsonse to this review: > https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/8eff67e8-ac88-4b7d-a90d-de32644d1d95@proxmox.com/ > > I didn't mean for this to be a fully finished patch. This was meant > as a follow up. Yes, I saw. But ah okay, that's why there was no full commit message, got it! > I am unsure how to reply to a review while sharing code at > the same time. I relied on `--in-reply-to=` paramter too much. > > Sorry for the trouble! No worries, this is fine :) > But your input resolves my confusion, so thanks a lot! :)