From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <aderumier@odiso.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF1B78147 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D04BF1C060 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4CB331C057 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id k128so35723172wmk.4 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:22:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HcUco3DjaL131mX7ZC8ZqSvkaBFR3ebqt3FUhqjZlF4=; b=Gvi9hu2FiT0spQITFgIVlG1sMWwghIEn3gBqvkhGJcTLFSejnbdfJazxqIQEn7Ibxr OtXgDUQ4nkFC/vHm3ZEXh2x7n6yYxHg7uf0fb3/ka7b/njP65o9lK9ztS+2RCjqxvIsC 99XlisJe9t51hpWODgnGK6wEabw3udFvallD/uGHRgz/U023ypfHibOq+5RSMvf0skPS mhW85+pKSriY64LF4qGo4baoHiIg+KDEKxXtl9dj6TzwL9Mvd9mIjqRepTP3/Ct8ZCyf oxaAdjTwZsDHr1kOjNwo+2vJPvSs/6JuFeVa9+Kk7KBsOHkGxYXwK4pzXIAoSLYVnxTL D7aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HcUco3DjaL131mX7ZC8ZqSvkaBFR3ebqt3FUhqjZlF4=; b=i1RxMm8dkATbP3k6yaUtM1qEwwU3LArMf2N2b8QriKAgjV2EdFjLc2Q2Lr41BPiQfR C1o4TYr1DMnYCWCNvDiWK00LyAtyYM6Alfj0mL+Yrzh8d8XvJKNRY4rHaxDJVBC10Ve6 b+Uq5ObP//Asnau2r67ITFoOXkn70OlT7P50OH8RaZ26P0/eR4O52BraHyq5XyynHmOW B4hTl7s/0jWuT4SdFl0tdRDKaTY2uGY6xzFHm4WM6+ptNpA12MoY9AWgB+1CjRqfaeZs rmzFFAkGH+Iqx+6OsG/ZfPB8ElNs6mxgyv3xWIBbIQ69l+y/AMvX3/KiCuYf5m9jaBeU bFgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zTVyuLNXTAIUXK1bHmA6bd16jCMncQwatzlqA2H2qFhToDh5X TRvzBmGcKUcGBCsx6hi8I8ARargPH1piiilS X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzte8qR00t2pyWrAgPp2HUt/ML04qs154aS0/sfnyM7dWmPBl50HQBN9p66m2aNx5zfCfJkcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f8b:: with SMTP id n11mr29655694wmq.136.1619698959964; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.59.100.76] (globalOdiso.M6Lille.odiso.net. [89.248.211.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm4390059wrs.21.2021.04.29.05.22.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75b097b24e8f9f5a67bc976b8dfb69bdaa18a9cd.camel@odiso.com> From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:22:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <d44114f0-0fa9-46f5-b105-46fa3edf1a89@proxmox.com> References: <20210429111759.231197-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <d44114f0-0fa9-46f5-b105-46fa3edf1a89@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.857 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v2 pve-network 0/3] zones: qinq : fix mutiples vnets/qinq zones X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:22:46 -0000 > Do you have other stuff pending, else I can do a version bump and > roll out now? can you wait a little bit, I'm currently working to implement forum user request for qinq with vnet without tag. (Should be ready for tommorow) Le jeudi 29 avril 2021 à 13:32 +0200, Thomas Lamprecht a écrit : > On 29.04.21 13:17, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > > This fix bugs with qinq when vmbr0 is ovs or classic bridge, > > when we define multiple vnets/qinq zones > > > > changelog v2: > > - fix typo in vlanaware test > > > > Alexandre Derumier (3): > > zones: qinq: ovs: fix duplicate ovs_ports with multiple > > zones/vnets > > zones: qinq: classic bridge: fix bridge zone name with multiple > > zones/vnets > > zones: qinq: vlanaware bridge: add tests with multiple > > vnets/zones > > > > PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/QinQPlugin.pm | 10 +++--- > > .../zones/qinq/bridge/expected_sdn_interfaces | 33 > > +++++++++++++++++-- > > test/zones/qinq/bridge/sdn_config | 7 +++- > > .../bridge_vlanaware/expected_sdn_interfaces | 20 +++++++++++ > > test/zones/qinq/bridge_vlanaware/sdn_config | 7 +++- > > .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- > > .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- > > test/zones/qinq/ovs/expected_sdn_interfaces | 28 > > +++++++++++++++- > > test/zones/qinq/ovs/sdn_config | 7 +++- > > 9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > > applied series, thanks! > > Do you have other stuff pending, else I can do a version bump and > roll out now? >