From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453FAD423 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 379EF5AB4 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mxout04.lancloud.ru (mxout04.lancloud.ru [45.84.86.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 582D55AA3 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from LanCloud DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mxout04.lancloud.ru 9245620991DA Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Message-ID: <746cb313-1ee4-8481-6904-a261634202e9@t8.ru> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:48:12 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list References: From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.851 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -3.877 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:48:20 -0000 Thanks for answers, I understand the configure hardware watchdog is not the best way. How I can change the Timer  when the 1 node from the cluster lost connectivity ( shutdown the switch)  go the reboot ? Is possible change the timer ? 15.04.2022 17:23, Michael Rasmussen via pve-user пишет: > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user Sergey TS The best Regard ______________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >From mir@miras.org Fri Apr 15 18:01:01 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E71D461 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DD836353 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AAF7C6344 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [83.93.223.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138574030F for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFF3120ED7 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date; s=dkim; t=1650038428; x=1650902429; bh=nLCnUhOt/iW0crQO4/tMJmHS 3TQRZyYDi+rePzXNtM0=; b=QbjRhuE44tF+oZZIbYLJ1sVE9vVgUveftAhp0SFc wF2v1q7bdrR17KZBfplW2EApLm+UXFKGJcMJc9dGLHAyXaHeImj7K3T55ApcKLJB YQpAl1QyL4qlX2+O/1eGAjowMFKNsKjrRiQoo9spzeO6h5/vFM9mX6MhH9bijGvS VQ0= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhZhrsAdMZMm for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79]) by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC47A120D96 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:27 +0200 From: Michael Rasmussen To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer Message-ID: <20220415180027.7d25dc74@sleipner.datanom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <746cb313-1ee4-8481-6904-a261634202e9@t8.ru> <20220415165642.0e5b20cb@sleipner.datanom.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=; PR}nK Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.686 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:01:01 -0000 --Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:17:26 +0300 =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE= =D0=B2 wrote: > Thank you for answer. >=20 > Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the timeout value is quite > small. >=20 > If node lost connection after 2 min is go to reboot is good > practices, I won't argue with you, maybe you're right. >=20 For the last 10 years I have been using Proxmox I have not have a lost connection to a server for over 1 sec without it being intentionally but if your circumstances is another usecase I would go for stackable switches I have a port for either switch connected to my servers and UPS control for all my servers. Loosing connection to a server for more than 1 sec can only mean hardware failure or loss of power. >=20 > 15.04.2022 17:56, Michael Rasmussen =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:48:12 +0300 > > =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0= =BE=D0=B2 wrote: > > =20 > >> Is possible change the timer ? > >> =20 > > AFAIK this requires changes to the watchdog code. To the best of my > > knowledge the timeout is configured according to best practices. > > > > Why do you want to change the timeout value? > > =20 > =D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC > =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE= =D0=B2 > =D0=A1=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=90=D0=B4=D0=BC= =D0=B8=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 =D0=9E=D0=9E= =D0=9E "=D0=A28" > =D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BB.: +74992716161 > =D0=9C=D0=BE=D0=B1: +79850334875 > logo_T8rus >=20 > tsabolov@t8.ru > =D0=9E=D0=9E=D0=9E =C2=AB=D0=A28=C2=BB, 107076, =D0=B3. =D0=9C=D0=BE=D1= =81=D0=BA=D0=B2=D0=B0 > =D0=9A=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=8B= =D1=80=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=8F =D1=83=D0=BB., =D0=B4. 44, =D1=81=D1=82=D1= =80.1 > www.t8.ru --=20 Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C mir miras org https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: (Never thought I'd be telling Malcolm and Ilya the same thing... :-) -- Larry Wall in <199711071819.KAA29909@wall.org> --Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZlpsACgkQx3wR4Emg bmb5ewf/YC7oNtX/ZIZW7AN0ociDi1obbjCGl+Z96svLX3huIY4nmtZ764zCoKIN V1UJ8oSrcXp7eAP4b6Drxdi/Un9CfL6fVhFOTi5XdT8MHAnoU516zPhh99neiFlX u8a1nvjkIJ4v+mJgCk2T996geYPHl/Uh6D/wXMPH+AllzmnIcRjOHu7huXe3h+Xl OwAIUKDzHdq6kk5fB9JIKx9nExsm1/bwjA6XYszrdmDhYNDoeW3iBPMMmxynYcHC +1qB23dwQGzlmRtYnRF0e7iMtgyTlqTR9VjNTIP1yK/odfm7KdXhpslyyb+V9gYg 9QMEibXfNGOtGxCtLxUiIO5FKAzXBA== =+uXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT--