From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3702471565 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B86B2411B for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 115F62410D for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D37FA4349C for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <71c20cf9-1b6e-119f-1183-d7d69ffb3797@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/101.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> References: <20220511140635.87279-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20220511140635.87279-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup 0/5] update and improve sysadmin documenation X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:14:42 -0000 Am 5/11/22 um 16:06 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov: > This patchset started from #3761 (adding kernel-pinning). > > I skimmed through the docs - fixed a few things which seemed not too > fitting for PBS > > else the chapter for system-booting is taken from pve-docs (with new > screenshots) and translated (more or less) mechanically to reST. > > Currently planning on similarly copying and adapting the certificate > documentation. > > In the long run I think it'd make sense to have a common docs repo > (proxmox-docs) for things that our products share (zfs, the acme > part of the certificate documentation) and just include the files. > (after some preprocessing and for the time being conversion > reST->asciidoc) > > Stoiko Ivanov (5): > docs: sysadmin: adapt kernel-specifics for PBS > docs: add system-booting from pve-docs > docs: system-booting: (re)add screenshots > docs: local-zfs: minor cleanup and adaptation > docs: zfs: update documentation about ZED applied, thanks!