From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A4660A1E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4DD591BF57 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B618A1BF4B for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 871C644D9B; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <705c9064-ad32-a84c-b9d7-2a108303945e@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/98.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Harikrishnan R <rharikrishnan95@gmail.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220215172846.2078929-1-rharikrishnan95@gmail.com> <20220215172846.2078929-2-rharikrishnan95@gmail.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20220215172846.2078929-2-rharikrishnan95@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [setup.pm, config.pm, nixos.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 container 1/1] Setup: add NixOS support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:06:39 -0000 On 15.02.22 18:28, Harikrishnan R wrote: > Distro detection is done through the presence of a /nix folder. > NixOS typically uses a script-based network configuration system > that isn't easy to configure from the outside. LXC templates > generated for proxmox are instead expected to use systemd-networkd. > > Signed-off-by: Harikrishnan R <rharikrishnan95@gmail.com> > --- > src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm | 2 +- > src/PVE/LXC/Setup.pm | 4 ++++ > src/PVE/LXC/Setup/Makefile | 1 + > src/PVE/LXC/Setup/NixOS.pm | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 src/PVE/LXC/Setup/NixOS.pm > > applied, thanks! I updated/reworded the commit message slightly though, e.g., it still referred to only checking for /nix as done in v1.