From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892F1694EB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7F8582A1F0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 05A452A1E2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C6DE5447CB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:26:50 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20210913120446.23392-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20210913120446.23392-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <6cd295e1-51a4-ae30-c86a-60fc3c47b436@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:26:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210913120446.23392-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 2.143 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -3.584 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC manager 1/1] api: nodes: set environment
 variable for shells started via the API
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:26:51 -0000

Am 13.09.21 um 14:04 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> so that proxmox-ve's apt hook script can detect this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>   PVE/API2/Nodes.pm | 10 +++++-----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Nodes.pm b/PVE/API2/Nodes.pm
> index e58d9c10..c57ad995 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Nodes.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Nodes.pm
> @@ -843,13 +843,13 @@ my $sslcert;
>   
>   my $shell_cmd_map = {
>       'login' => {
> -	cmd => [ '/bin/login', '-f', 'root' ],
> +	cmd => [ '/bin/login', '-f', 'root', 'PVE_API_SHELL=1' ],
>       },
>       'upgrade' => {
> -	cmd => [ '/usr/bin/pveupgrade', '--shell' ],
> +	cmd => [ '/usr/bin/env', 'PVE_API_SHELL=1', '/usr/bin/pveupgrade', '--shell' ],
>       },
>       'ceph_install' => {
> -	cmd => [ '/usr/bin/pveceph', 'install' ],
> +	cmd => [ '/usr/bin/env', 'PVE_API_SHELL=1', '/usr/bin/pveceph', 'install' ],
>   	allow_args => 1,
>       },
>   };
> @@ -866,11 +866,11 @@ sub get_shell_command  {
>   		push @$cmd, split("\0", $args);
>   	    }
>   	} else {
> -	    $cmd = [ '/bin/login', '-f', 'root' ];
> +	    $cmd = [ '/bin/login', '-f', 'root', 'PVE_API_SHELL=1' ];
>   	}
>       } else {
>   	# non-root must always login for now, we do not have a superuser role!
> -	$cmd = [ '/bin/login' ];
> +	$cmd = [ '/bin/login', 'PVE_API_SHELL=1' ];

Sorry, I think the PVE_API_SHELL=1 gets interpreted as the username in 
this case. I'll fix that in v2 if we even go with this approach.

>       }
>       return $cmd;
>   }
>