From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 89C1D70C62 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id 8191717941 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTPS id 7A39417931 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id 4994E46773 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6b5ceb06-2bd3-f88e-3a3c-c62deca0a408@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:39:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <CAMnnoULK0y8YvsWZCJpwmGgQKtq=3rTG_ttEtWbDYF3+12hFzA.ref@mail.gmail.com> <CAMnnoULK0y8YvsWZCJpwmGgQKtq=3rTG_ttEtWbDYF3+12hFzA@mail.gmail.com> <f238809a-b894-c1b8-0dd0-677d88cc840a@proxmox.com> From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <f238809a-b894-c1b8-0dd0-677d88cc840a@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.727 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Proxmox 7.0 Beta - Ceph "a password is required" error messages? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:39:35 -0000 > > does the file '/etc/sudoers.d/ceph-osd-smartcl' exist in your installation? sorry, typo, should be '/etc/sudoers.d/ceph-osd-smartctl'