From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814E679D84
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:03:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 640CC1C90E
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:03:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A5B091C902
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:03:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 74DA645B29
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:03:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <11c22442-2494-4fc5-6622-4968b50b6966@marcobertorello.it>
 <651b6824-4023-2726-5d2d-8f969853e9c5@proxmox.com>
 <407c5765-770d-6597-c1f1-19e78723ddd8@marcobertorello.it>
 <e90e3cbd-b94e-9439-602f-70cabded7fd9@proxmox.com>
 <4f5a8f4b-eb59-1d07-d4bf-bd1d80911b69@marcobertorello.it>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <6a8822a7-f19b-c3a7-0205-0a1296fc98b5@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:02:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4f5a8f4b-eb59-1d07-d4bf-bd1d80911b69@marcobertorello.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.706 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -2.905 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Container exceed disk size
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:03:44 -0000

Am 27.10.21 um 10:03 schrieb Bertorello, Marco:
> Il 27/10/2021 09:55, Fabian Ebner ha scritto:
>>
>> I'm not able to reproduce the issue here. Could you share the output of
>>     zpool history | grep subvol-119
>> ? 
> 
> sure, the output is in the attached file.
>

Thanks! So the container was migrated to another node and then 
replicated/migrated back. But in our code, the -p flag is used for zfs 
send, so properties like refquota should be preserved. Could you also 
check the history on the other node(s)?

> Best regards,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>