From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560E966983
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Jan 2021 13:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 416C12B2DB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Jan 2021 13:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 825D42B2CD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  8 Jan 2021 13:29:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 44CFA44010;
 Fri,  8 Jan 2021 13:29:47 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Gilles Pietri <contact+dev@gilouweb.com>
References: <20210107170244.168204-1-contact+dev@gilouweb.com>
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <6638db09-3492-bb37-29b3-64dd606da99b@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:29:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210107170244.168204-1-contact+dev@gilouweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.112 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.267 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES] add none audio backend
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 12:30:18 -0000

The series looks good to me.

One thing we need to do is to adapt the documentation because right now it specifically mentions that the audio device only works in combination with Spice.

Reviewed-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>

On 1/7/21 6:02 PM, Gilles Pietri wrote:
> Add the 'none' audio backend as an option for qemu-server: it behaves
> the same as the spice one (id=,driver=), and simply discards audio.
> Add the option in the Web UI for audio configuration.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> 
>