From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807C41FF15C for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 13:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9209716580; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 13:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <64c9dbe9-7bff-44e0-acc3-e6b3e315edde@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 13:56:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20250806142927.344007-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <20250806142927.344007-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.707 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [main.rs, proxmox.com, helper.rs] Subject: [pbs-devel] superseded: [PATCH proxmox{, -network-interface-pinning} 0/2] fix reading ip link output for interfaces without MAC address X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/20250808102333.121994-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/ On 8/6/25 4:31 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > As reported in the forum by [1], there are types of interfaces that do not have > a MAC address, so the address field in IpLink need to be optional instead of > required. > > [1] https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-backup-proxy-seemingly-crashes-after-being-accessed-through-reverse-proxy-after-update-to-4-0.169313/ > > proxmox: > > Stefan Hanreich (1): > network-api: make address field optional > > proxmox-network-api/src/config/helper.rs | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > proxmox-network-interface-pinning: > > Stefan Hanreich (1): > network-interface-pinning: adapt to optional mac address > > src/main.rs | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > Summary over all repositories: > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel