From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE3E9155E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:58:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E658F5144 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:58:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 03EC945E7F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:58:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <644f9836-513a-4eeb-ca65-65faec2eee51@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:58:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:110.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/110.0 Content-Language: de-AT, en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Leo Nunner <l.nunner@proxmox.com> References: <20221201113257.57225-1-l.nunner@proxmox.com> <71e16b47-d5c2-cdbc-c97a-eb332c4a7a09@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <71e16b47-d5c2-cdbc-c97a-eb332c4a7a09@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [cephfsplugin.pm, cifsplugin.pm, plugin.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage manager docs] Allow mounting of CIFS subdirectories X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 14:58:14 -0000 Am 02/02/2023 um 15:20 schrieb Leo Nunner: > On 2022-12-01 12:32, Leo Nunner wrote: >> CIFS supports mounting subdirectories inside a share, so it makes sense >> to also have the 'subdir' parameter for the CIFS backend. I'm also >> looking into allowing overrides for all the fixed directories, but >> even then, I think it makes sense to support this parameter (for either >> providing a prefix to all the other directories, or just changing the >> base directory). >> >> storage: >> >> Leo Nunner (1): >> fix #2641: allow mounting of CIFS subdirectories >> >> PVE/Storage/CIFSPlugin.pm | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> PVE/Storage/CephFSPlugin.pm | 4 ---- >> PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm | 5 +++++ >> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> manager: >> >> Leo Nunner (1): >> fix #2641: expose CIFS subdir parameter through GUI >> >> www/manager6/storage/CIFSEdit.js | 11 +++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) >> >> docs: >> >> Leo Nunner (1): >> fix #2641: document subdir parameter for CIFS backend >> >> pve-storage-cifs.adoc | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > Bump due to continued user demand. storage and manager seem to still storage produces a merge conflict, that git could auto-merge. Would be great if you could send a v2 for manager and docs, as those I'd apply then once storage is bumped.