From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942BD6223C; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 892CAFE58; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11C67FE4D; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF4A645846; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:32 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20200916121419.3997-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> <20200916121419.3997-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <641184f6-4b24-36b5-b9c5-b01d5a0e115f@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/82.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200916121419.3997-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.167 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [RFC zfsonlinux 1/1] Add systemd-unit for importing specific pools X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:03:33 -0000 On 16.09.20 14:14, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > This patch addresses the problems some users experience when some zpool= s are > created/imported with cachefile (which then causes other pools not to g= et > imported during boot) - when our tooling creates a pool we explictly > instantiate the service with the pool's name, ensuring that it will get= > imported by scanning. >=20 > Suggested-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> > Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> > --- > ...md-unit-for-importing-specific-pools.patch | 75 +++++++++++++++++++= > debian/patches/series | 1 + > debian/zfsutils-linux.install | 1 + > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/0008-Add-systemd-unit-for-importing-= specific-pools.patch >=20 > applied, thanks! Dropped the "Require=3Dsystemd-udev-settle.service", tho= ugh. But, it's still ordered after. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942BD6223C; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 892CAFE58; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11C67FE4D; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF4A645846; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:32 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20200916121419.3997-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> <20200916121419.3997-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <641184f6-4b24-36b5-b9c5-b01d5a0e115f@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/82.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200916121419.3997-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.167 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [pve-devel] [RFC zfsonlinux 1/1] Add systemd-unit for importing specific pools X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:03:33 -0000 On 16.09.20 14:14, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > This patch addresses the problems some users experience when some zpool= s are > created/imported with cachefile (which then causes other pools not to g= et > imported during boot) - when our tooling creates a pool we explictly > instantiate the service with the pool's name, ensuring that it will get= > imported by scanning. >=20 > Suggested-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> > Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> > --- > ...md-unit-for-importing-specific-pools.patch | 75 +++++++++++++++++++= > debian/patches/series | 1 + > debian/zfsutils-linux.install | 1 + > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/0008-Add-systemd-unit-for-importing-= specific-pools.patch >=20 > applied, thanks! Dropped the "Require=3Dsystemd-udev-settle.service", tho= ugh. But, it's still ordered after.