From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68AAF1FF141 for ; Tue, 05 May 2026 14:13:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0ACE026DAC; Tue, 5 May 2026 14:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5fac72a6-7686-4ad1-a91d-f1f1754aca6f@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 14:12:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH yew-comp v4 13/40] widget: kvlist: add widget for user-modifiable data tables To: Christoph Heiss , pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260430124712.1614305-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <20260430124712.1614305-14-c.heiss@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20260430124712.1614305-14-c.heiss@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777983072393 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: DGVU7AASDWEU5WG2CG7BYKA6UTP62MEN X-Message-ID-Hash: DGVU7AASDWEU5WG2CG7BYKA6UTP62MEN X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: applied this one, thanks! pushed a few follow ups, so please check if everything still works. (i tested it briefly so it should work ;) ) Did not change the interface of the Renderer though (since that would require a change in the pdm patches i guess), can still be improved later on if needed.