From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A661FF168 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 17:12:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04D00E109; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 17:12:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5d64952d-a6ef-4884-bea4-90c2c9ef0df7@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 17:12:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Dominik Csapak , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20250121100415.64884-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com> <20250121100415.64884-4-h.duerr@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hannes_D=C3=BCrr?= In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.034 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-nvidia-vgpu-helper v2 3/4] add pve-nvidia-vgpu-helper and Makefile to make dependency installtion more convenient X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 1/21/25 16:36, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 21.01.25 um 11:47 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> It's probably not a bad idea to install the packages for all installed kernel versions? (@Thomas ?) > Yeah, would be definitively a nice UX enhancement. sounds good to me, will do. >> Not super sure about how exactly DKMS works, but i think it tries to compile for all installed >> kernel versions no? > While I currently do not know the full semantics of DKMS, I also think > that it will build for all kernels that are installed, so that users can > boot these newer/other kernels and directly use the out-of-tree module > managed by DKMS. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel