From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <aderumier@odiso.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5373877699 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4307824A7A for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6E2C424A6C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:36:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id t18so3767355wry.1 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=0rW/GS1tN5EAY4CuN1h4A+Tjzsnamk7L922tsYSQ0CY=; b=YVAMXjAsiZrTr5itn12/r3DNTztxgkHHEVhXTnFss1K887jUywmpv/bTjLCBNBugSz JaXsh3L8kn3/G53noPnvPQL+ySxRwyNgzNde3b2SbdXQNc1F9eHhZF+cYQpMiw6YhKcU bo4cinUZVFVI+mdwPDn0EjRCR1aEbkju0CWuhPz1haUlIODZDtgu98DE079EiIpSU5+X ZWVyKnStgu9Ma/zEpjZJpYFb9W3m8m+CMjThyqcFBreXGvrO1q4Bf075kycOSy0DcmC1 D+Yvcd5j74ocT7wOIJk+N7yoSMsd9/78nx5u2vySByfYq80B8zhuSV22eCBl1c03/1pp 2J3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=0rW/GS1tN5EAY4CuN1h4A+Tjzsnamk7L922tsYSQ0CY=; b=XMgP3tRY+D5rJtT314cUZEY1ZkWry88ywGLl1DQyH9gYNejfgCZ6IB9S0h5paqcGwM PjjtI5h35NeenWjytfSPt2Lsi6we0N7T1n98VK3lCUzguRnyfyOV0KsVrpnhEZt+M0qr YO3O1rA2WcCtMnyJ9dYGSqqXW0tREFzDXJhK5IgT1llWN86CMqscoYGiNgAcyfJYSlC9 dzW2FjP9N3bnZ+hrQ2StO2B+BtoflBvikzyz7yVJKoZvSAbxGYuKj6CQFienpuiyacT4 NxmBarhxfzNTgLlpsd2UR6+y54euJ9aWSfyHi26+HBJZ6aJKI9NpLCiX/eUVvPtspFyC i2Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NC+f8QtEI8RwMb358hBTFt/tbw9OkznUserMZRwXC3BSRdquA lpCclVi8pyu79AkNL44pYZ42U6lsCTk4mKHq X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWa9eK46FhZeOgGUSUNe0TX66fcrHurbqQut42fa+OSQJUfvWxYscw65VmM3cERWN/AA3h6g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5110:: with SMTP id s16mr25546019wrt.337.1619577373950; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.50] ([79.132.252.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v20sm1857644wmj.15.2021.04.27.19.36.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:36:13 -0700 (PDT) To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20210421215339.1801755-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <96e121b1-0731-7ec9-34a0-335336347563@proxmox.com> From: alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com> Message-ID: <5a2fd8f3-0ab8-6a7a-eda6-6a04cbaecd66@odiso.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:36:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <96e121b1-0731-7ec9-34a0-335336347563@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.110 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v12 pve-manager 0/4] sdn: add subnet/ipam/sdn management X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 02:36:21 -0000 >>applied, thanks! The gui looks now quite clean, I like it this way! Thanks Thomas for the cleanup too ! I'll check the doc too, as I have moved some options. and I'll try to see if I can add some graphviz schema for complex setup + some examples for setup like heztner. On 26/04/2021 20:08, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 21.04.21 23:53, Alexandre Derumier wrote: >> changelog v11: >> No code changes since v10, only identation cleanup. >> >> rebased on last master and patches merged together >> >> changelog v12: >> add last pve-network changes >> >> >> Small reminder of other related patches: >> >> pve-network: >> [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 pve-network 0/6] evpn && bgp improvements >> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-April/047800.html >> >> >> pve-cluster: >> >> [PATCH V5 pve-cluster 0/5] sdn : add subnets management >> >> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-September/045284.html >> >> >> pve-common: >> >> INotify: add support for dummy interfaces type >> >> (this is a small patch for ebgp loopback/dummy interface support) >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com/msg01755.html >> >> >> pve-container: (maybe we could wait a little bit to finish qemu support too) >> >> [PATCH pve-container] add ipam support >> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-January/046609.html >> >> >> Alexandre Derumier (4): >> sdn: add subnet/ipam/sdn management >> sdn: move mac option from vnet to evpn zone plugin >> sdn: controller: bgp: add ebgp-multihop option >> sdn: controllers: bgp: use node as controllerid >> > > applied, thanks! The gui looks now quite clean, I like it this way! >