From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974689CD74
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  1 Jun 2023 18:00:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7327220A72
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  1 Jun 2023 18:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  1 Jun 2023 18:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C281B482DB;
 Thu,  1 Jun 2023 18:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5a05ae07-7002-8e3a-1e11-bd5269d58e4f@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:00:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>,
 "aderumier@odiso.com" <aderumier@odiso.com>
References: <20230522102528.186955-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
 <4d8191f2-4954-1e4f-a40c-51544289b2ce@proxmox.com>
 <036ad8c33f6af74da89eb8b9c24c1c6cda8fc938.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
 <8277a27b-a70f-b731-69f7-fc9ae69b2da2@binovo.es>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <8277a27b-a70f-b731-69f7-fc9ae69b2da2@binovo.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.091 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v3 qemu-server/manager/common] add
 and set x86-64-v2 as default model for new vms and detect best cpumodel
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 16:00:57 -0000

Am 01.06.23 um 14:02 schrieb Eneko Lacunza:
> Hi,
> 
> We have Ryzen 1700, 2600X, 3700 and 5950X machines here, I can test on
> them if that helps (please detail tests to perform).
> 
> Thanks
> 

Hi,
thank you for the offer. It would be interesting to see if you have any
issues with the following:

> qm set <ID> -args '-cpu kvm64,enforce,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,+sep,+lahf_lm,+popcnt,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+ssse3'

If you like you can also test

> qm set <ID> -args '-cpu Nehalem,enforce,+aes,-svm,-vmx,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,vendor="GenuineIntel"'

After testing use

> qm set <ID> --delete args

to get rid of the modification again.

Make sure to stop/start the VM fresh after each modification.

As for what to test, installing Debian 11 would be nice just for
comparison, but other than that, just do what you like, shouldn't really
matter too much :)

Best Regards,
Fiona