From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7FD98CBB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:07:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 56B6C30340
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:07:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D3F544976
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57a309c1-6e96-4ba4-b2b5-bae4067d0935@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:07:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-AT, en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
References: <20231010074259.28301-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com>
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231010074259.28301-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-i18n] update German translation
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:07:17 -0000

Hi again,

On 10/10/23 09:42, Hannes Duerr wrote:
> update German translation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Hab die Änderungen aufgenommen

not a blocker for this patch (so no need to send another version, as
this won't be visible in the commit message), but usually you'd write
something like this here:

Changes v2 -> v3:
   - changed ...
   - added ...

Changes v1 -> v2:
   - changed ...
   - removed ...

The format is not really standardized/important, as long the information
is there ;) It helps your colleagues when reviewing your (updated)
patches.

> 
>   de.po | 121 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 
--- SNIP 8< ---

-- 
- Lukas