From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959A91FF37F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:33:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3BE181D621;
	Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:33:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <571770cca597a266fb2ae76b1f5cfff41f03e4ed.camel@proxmox.com>
From: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
To: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development
 discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:32:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4e5145ba-abdc-499c-a748-027a0306d773@proxmox.com>
References: <20240418091650.51366-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
 <20240418091650.51366-6-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
 <4e5145ba-abdc-499c-a748-027a0306d773@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.089 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 6/7] report: add info about (un)used
 memory slots
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 12:16 +0200, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> I am not sure how often we actually need that information as it can add 
> quite a bit of additional lines in the report in larger machines with 
> many memory slots.

Good point. So in this case we could simply compact the output by counting, without loosing any information:

# dmidecode -t 16,17 | grep -P "^\t(Max[^:]*city|Size|Part)" | sed -Ez "s/\n(\tP[^\n]*)/\1/g" | sort | uniq -c
      1 	Maximum Capacity: 2 TB
      4 	Size: 16 GB	Part Number: 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1
      4 	Size: No Module Installed


> It might be better to keep that command in a cheatsheet to ask for it if 
> actually needed instead of polluting the report :)
> 
> On  2024-04-18  11:16, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
> > * to see if a RAM upgrade is slot/capacity-wise possible
> > * to spot added/replaced RAM that may now be causing issues
> > 
> > 	Maximum Capacity: 2 TB
> > 	Size: 16 GB	Part Number: 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1
> > 	Size: 16 GB	Part Number: 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1
> > 	Size: 16 GB	Part Number: 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1
> > 	Size: 16 GB	Part Number: 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1
> > 	Size: No Module Installed
> > 	Size: No Module Installed
> > 	Size: No Module Installed
> > 	Size: No Module Installed



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel