From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <d.whyte@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79228739DE for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:42:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6712423440 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:42:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E4F3023435 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:42:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 90E2E4599F for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:42:12 +0200 (CEST) To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20211006151957.437820-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com> <b0cf0835-e3e6-c1dc-4277-b03cdc0d8a64@proxmox.com> From: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <56f10636-1a8b-2e20-66b5-94b0d26aba0f@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:42:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <b0cf0835-e3e6-c1dc-4277-b03cdc0d8a64@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.548 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.964 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: language and formatting fixup X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 07:42:43 -0000 On 10/8/21 6:59 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > some questions below: > > On 10/6/21 5:19 PM, Dylan Whyte wrote: >> --- a/docs/installation.rst >> +++ b/docs/installation.rst >> @@ -19,24 +19,24 @@ for various management tasks such as disk >> management. >> `Proxmox Backup`_ without the server part. > > We use `Proxmox Backup`_ here (which is defined in epilog.rst) > >> The disk image (ISO file) provided by Proxmox includes a complete >> Debian system >> -as well as all necessary packages for the `Proxmox Backup`_ server. >> +as well as all necessary packages for the `Proxmox Backup Server`_. >> The installer will guide you through the setup process and allow >> -you to partition the local disk(s), apply basic system configurations >> -(e.g. timezone, language, network), and install all required packages. >> +you to partition the local disk(s), apply basic system configuration >> +(for example timezone, language, network), and install all required >> packages. >> The provided ISO will get you started in just a few minutes, and is >> the >> recommended method for new and existing users. >> -Alternatively, `Proxmox Backup`_ server can be installed on top of an >> +Alternatively, `Proxmox Backup Server`_ can be installed on top of an > > So why do you change that here? Where is `Proxmox Backup Server`_ > defined? Ah that's my bad. I update the epilog.rst as I thought it made more sense to have the hyperlink cover the full name of the product, but i forgot to include it with the patch.. Will fix it in a v2. > > Dylan