From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lists@merit.unu.edu>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4359D61BC1
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:10:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 32A762A539
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:10:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.merit.unu.edu (mail.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.6])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 339D82A528
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:09:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.87.143.100] (ws100.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.100])
 by mail.merit.unu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBB0819B9A6B
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:02:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=merit.unu.edu;
 s=2021-1; t=1642510953;
 bh=9x/IYsVqsvnt3oruisoN9ltQJ1o+fP3Z4ZONfr97TlQ=;
 h=Date:To:From:Subject:From;
 b=BjYpOEJnfutfnmeyFSOd47fI/j2U+e6dsr65Ys5ns71ErysInf72bUx1lxsRiCtrI
 qnASlSht+rDB+JjkK9+rPv1Wmg8kJrl+ybF5LbhrdzkuUzgM4WPSuwSF2E1SyIAJTn
 Lcc97gb12v+0YQDpElW4tdW3puO48JTw5x4bd7bGUD14ySsmBicISKnmsMWL6mOv1x
 VR4FFCQl/sOTUk+OjStAalh70DqOdYFeXGTVJgsfLfG1LlJpb6XU31ue9VWsYj7VPc
 O5QKee44NpQbOnkfwDbnCtedHC+O4KgqIhg9/vRdr1eZNur91gdHDxQ559/w2dzZHp
 75YvWM32LYODA==
Message-ID: <5488c340-0a68-cb7d-4e65-e9a5fcfa7f23@merit.unu.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:02:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: mj <lists@merit.unu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.553 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com, unu.edu]
Subject: [PVE-User] windows remote desktop services as VM on proxmox
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:10:00 -0000

Hi,

We are looking into windows remote desktop services, and would like to 
see how feasible it is to run it through our proxmox cluster.

Currently our VMs are all linux, so we have no experience with windows 
VMs on proxmox. I have read some of the docs on the pve wiki, like 
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Windows_10_guest_best_practices

But looking for some practical guidance, like how well do windows VMs 
run under proxmox? Anything special to consider?

Thanks!