From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B79634B7 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:41:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 05F9B2B01E for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:41:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3A2BF2B010 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:41:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 053C8455D6 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:41:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:40:40 +0100 (CET) From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com> To: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <54278153.2188.1608633641363@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <dbaa42ca-791a-a8d1-8e8a-24928790aa8b@proxmox.com> References: <20201221135611.14456-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> <1412279965.2136.1608565017552@webmail.proxmox.com> <5c0cbe82-1cd1-aeae-6363-097ca054506f@proxmox.com> <1481561822.2144.1608568808408@webmail.proxmox.com> <dbaa42ca-791a-a8d1-8e8a-24928790aa8b@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev14 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.110 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC 0/2] backup client: implement some HTTP timeouts X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:41:41 -0000 > On 12/22/2020 9:47 AM Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com> wrote: > > > On 12/21/20 5:40 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > >> Came up during discussion of this report: > >> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/qmp-command-backup-failed-got-timeout.77749/#post-357700 > >> > >> where high load on the server (from too many verification tasks, which > >> is a different problem) causes VM clients to hang for unreasonable > >> amounts of time. > > > > But with a 20s timeout, the backup would fail quit fast - this is probably also not what the user wants? > > > > This is only on the initial UPGRADE request, I also do not want that backup fails in initial UPGRADE (maybe I do not understand your arguments).