From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2E11FF15C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:07:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 66565D048; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:08:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53ae3930-05a3-4424-b231-d91c510dc000@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:08:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Anton Iacobaeus , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20251028125459.287308-1-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> <20251028125459.287308-10-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> <9e7f7269-d718-4854-9594-b87f42afb4c6@proxmox.com> <9c701bd2-f62f-47cc-b90a-c9d9be779b96@canarybit.eu> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <9c701bd2-f62f-47cc-b90a-c9d9be779b96@canarybit.eu> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1763114859443 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v3 4/4] Add support for TDX quote-generation-socket object X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 14.11.25 um 7:46 AM schrieb Anton Iacobaeus: > Yes I agree, vsock+cid+port will be enough for most users and we can add > more if requested. I added Unix sockets since it is the default in > libvirt, but vsock should always be easy to setup. 'unix-tight' and > 'unix-abstract' was added to match the QEMU schema, doubt that they are > needed in many cases. > > Do you want a v4 with only vsock and the below style nits addressed? Yes, please! I'm not sure it will make it into the upcoming release of Proxmox VE 9.1, but can be applied soon after otherwise. Best Regards, Fiona _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel