From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C4799175
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33A292C21E
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
 id AFDA03CBF7E; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>) id 1ppUvB-0000ir-R8
 for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:06:01 +0200
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:34:15 +0200
Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!!
Message-ID: <52h7hj-mvo.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
References: <6nj5hj-3a81.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
 <C8002500-3A9E-4DAB-A607-5DF62CFB7CE4@wolfspyre.com>
X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1681998793 313 192.168.24.2 (20 Apr 2023
 13:53:13 GMT)
To: Wolf Noble <wolf@wolfspyre.com>
X-Mailer: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-70-generic (x86_64))
X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 <news.lilliput.linux.it>
Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
In-Reply-To: <C8002500-3A9E-4DAB-A607-5DF62CFB7CE4@wolfspyre.com>;
 from SmartGate on Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 16:06:01PM +0200
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -1.688 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_20               -0.001 Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06      1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL           0.5 SPF set to ?all
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] DELL PowerEdge T440/PERC H750 and embarassing HDD
 performance...
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:10:06 -0000

Mandi! Wolf Noble
  In chel di` si favelave...

> The voodoo of zfs and how it talks to the disks is a vast and confusing subject??? there???s lots of moving pieces, and it???s a huge rabbit hole???.

Right. But this seems a 'good passthru raid0', more like an JBOD mode then a
raid0... anyway, SSD disk connected to the same controller behave
correctly, so it is still strange...

-- 
  Se non trovi nessuno vuol dire che siamo scappati alle sei-shell (bash,
  tcsh,csh...)							(Possi)