From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D2390A76
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:17:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F18513A25
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:16:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:16:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 69C8142B5A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:16:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:16:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <52833257.5525.1696231002479@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <ed47da8b-b31c-44b3-bbd0-725cf2226a0c@proxmox.com>
References: <20230811104654.56916-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
<ed47da8b-b31c-44b3-bbd0-725cf2226a0c@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev50
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [subscription.pm, proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager] website: update external links
to www.proxmox.com
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 07:17:15 -0000
Okay, thanks for the clarification.
> On 30.09.2023 10:07 CEST Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am 11/08/2023 um 12:46 schrieb Christian Ebner:
> > During the redesign of www.proxmox.com the menu structure and therefore
> > some url changed. Update the external link in order to avoid an
> > unneccessary redirect
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
> > ---
> > PVE/API2/Subscription.pm | 2 +-
> > aplinfo/aplinfo.dat | 4 ++--
> > www/manager6/Utils.js | 2 +-
> > www/manager6/dc/Summary.js | 2 +-
> > www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js | 1 -
> > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/PVE/API2/Subscription.pm b/PVE/API2/Subscription.pm
> > index c7b81ee9..96fcd4e5 100644
> > --- a/PVE/API2/Subscription.pm
> > +++ b/PVE/API2/Subscription.pm
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> > my $has_permission = $rpcenv->check($authuser, "/nodes/$node", ['Sys.Audit'], 1);
> >
> > my $server_id = PVE::API2Tools::get_hwaddress();
> > - my $url = "https://www.proxmox.com/proxmox-ve/pricing";
> > + my $url = "https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-virtual-environment/pricing";
> >
> > my $info = read_etc_subscription();
> > if (!$info) {
> > diff --git a/aplinfo/aplinfo.dat b/aplinfo/aplinfo.dat
> > index 95a8be5a..8382bd7d 100644
> > --- a/aplinfo/aplinfo.dat
> > +++ b/aplinfo/aplinfo.dat
> > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ Architecture: amd64
> > Location: mail/proxmox-mailgateway-7.3-standard_7.3-1_amd64.tar.zst
> > md5sum: 6c130003f9880ae66dca0603d7b7ca87
> > sha512sum: 2fdf1dc24306bbaa2ef9a0f322416ca15b97b7d19f84b83743c7afc896095c398241fbc2eb41a33a69f3f275ce4c4cb6425edc5538831b4650d39a5e44fdbc25
> > -Infopage: https://www.proxmox.com/de/proxmox-mail-gateway
> > +Infopage: https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-mail-gateway/overview
> > Description: Proxmox Mailgateway 7.3
> > A full featured mail proxy for spam and virus filtering, optimized for container environment.
> >
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Architecture: amd64
> > Location: mail/proxmox-mailgateway-8.0-standard_8.0-1_amd64.tar.zst
> > md5sum: 7d321e5dfc6e1005231586d1871e3625
> > sha512sum: be5efcb8ee97f2bb1c638360191eda19f49e2063acb88da55c948c90c091063972cc9ea29e6aeaa4a85733e0fb2c99ea905d665ac693cb2bf06b091c4baf781f
> > -Infopage: https://www.proxmox.com/de/proxmox-mail-gateway
> > +Infopage: https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-mail-gateway/overview
> > Description: Proxmox Mailgateway 8.0
> > A full featured mail proxy for spam and virus filtering, optimized for container environment.
> >
>
> yeah no, those are only tracked here to provide an initial list of available
> templates after installation, i.e., before the daily update service does the
> equivalent of `pveam update` and overrides these again.
>
> The next dab appliance update will "fix" these, but it shouldn't matter,
> those links are not easily accessible by users and we (hopefully) keep
> old URLs reachable for a long time..