From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85C41FF15E for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:04:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A68C816545; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51e5daa8-fc22-4dcb-9fb2-284d6c174583@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:04:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20250613075443.63136-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <7399df66-9015-4771-ae0d-4fc4e048ff4a@proxmox.com> Content-Language: de-AT, en-US From: Lukas Wagner In-Reply-To: <7399df66-9015-4771-ae0d-4fc4e048ff4a@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH promxox-mail-forward v2] fix logging by switching to proxmox-log X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 2025-06-16 21:28, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> >> [dependencies] >> anyhow = "1.0" >> -log = "0.4.17" >> nix = "0.26" >> -syslog = "6.0" >> >> -proxmox-sys = "0.6" >> +proxmox-log = "0.2.8" >> proxmox-notify = {version = "0.5.4", features = ["mail-forwarder", "pve-context", "pbs-context"] } >> +proxmox-sys = "0.6" > > This is for bookworm based releases, is this not required for trixie based > releases anymore? It is relevant for both, Bookworm and Trixie. proxmox-mail-forward has no stable-bookworm branch yet, nor any Trixie-based deps on master, hence I based my patch on the current master, which is Bookworm. -- - Lukas _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel