From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CB91FF183 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 80ACADE1C; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:40:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:29:26 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4e2222b8-f423-41e3-a6fb-522a6f792f0b@gilouweb.com> <4d28ql-5ua2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1758731525 2296847 192.168.24.2 (24 Sep 2025 16:32:05 GMT) To: Marco Gaiarin X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-29-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 In-Reply-To: <4d28ql-5ua2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it>; from SmartGate on Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 18:36:02PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.287 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! Marco Gaiarin In chel di` si favelave... > Uh, wait... effectively we forgot to enable 'discard' on volumes, and we have > enabled afterward (but rebooted the VM). > I'll check refreservation property and report back. No, volumes seems have all refreservation to 'none', as expected; current situation is: root@lamprologus:~# zfs list | grep ^rpool-data rpool-data 54.2T 3.84T 171K /rpool-data rpool-data/vm-100-disk-0 1.11T 3.84T 1.11T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-1 2.32T 3.84T 2.32T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-10 1.82T 3.84T 1.82T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-11 2.03T 3.84T 2.03T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-12 1.96T 3.84T 1.96T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-13 2.48T 3.84T 2.48T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-14 2.21T 3.84T 2.21T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-15 2.42T 3.84T 2.42T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-16 2.15T 3.84T 2.15T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-17 2.14T 3.84T 2.14T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 3.39T 3.84T 3.39T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 3.40T 3.84T 3.40T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-2 1.32T 3.84T 1.32T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-20 3.36T 3.84T 3.36T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-21 2.50T 3.84T 2.50T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-22 3.22T 3.84T 3.22T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-23 2.73T 3.84T 2.73T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-24 2.53T 3.84T 2.53T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-3 213K 3.84T 213K - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-4 213K 3.84T 213K - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-5 2.33T 3.84T 2.33T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-6 2.28T 3.84T 2.28T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-7 2.13T 3.84T 2.13T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-8 2.29T 3.84T 2.29T - rpool-data/vm-100-disk-9 2.11T 3.84T 2.11T - and a random volume (but all are similar): root@lamprologus:~# zfs get all rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 | grep refreservation rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 refreservation none default rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 usedbyrefreservation 0B - Another strange thing is that all are 2TB volumes: root@lamprologus:~# cat /etc/pve/qemu-server/100.conf | grep vm-100-disk-19 scsi20: rpool-data:vm-100-disk-19,backup=0,discard=on,replicate=0,size=2000G but: root@lamprologus:~# zfs list rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 3.40T 3.84T 3.40T - why 'USED' is 3.40T? Thanks. -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user