From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E6E1FF13E for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:03:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C8079EA0B; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:03:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:02:53 +0100 From: Arthur Bied-Charreton To: Christian Ebner Message-ID: <4kayjfmgoktupb4p6l65csi4igndqwlcqcyadfvz33w3b3mmqd@xjyyfiydy7ao> References: <20260121104537.495434-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <299b3a77-f1a3-4081-bb49-a99c83c7a11e@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <299b3a77-f1a3-4081-bb49-a99c83c7a11e@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1769176915321 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.859 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{, -backup} v2 0/2] GC: log progress output for phase 2 S3 datastores X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Cc: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 02:54:24PM +0100, Christian Ebner wrote: > This was done with the intention to maybe use the same counters also for > enforcing soft limits and/or enforce warnings when certain thresholds have > been reached, where stricter ordering might be needed. Hey Christian, I see, thanks for the explanation :) _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel