From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403CD61110
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:18:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3E2A420857
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:18:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 44B952084D
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:18:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id t21so5234355pgl.3
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:18:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language;
 bh=Eok/pRUDxOyegPNqDHCR2CwWhYD/7Jscocl2BZOG7q8=;
 b=PkGEwlQn6vjiW85RFEvwQLZ8I80IzXHJnaPCJGtwxi+zUrckRehqgtXt7P4Y4JCXA2
 TI2PnQdy1T1IYOCVIdXfTz2eiC0zYx+jtUouKhbpOp51R+PZzIWWLOSh5584ROCBux6G
 +wXQ6R1jY2cUvyXlhKdh9+CpDnpyAV+bEm4BX7f+k6Gpt50mNkPGZPnVOtW4iHJC8YBt
 ttbzREIL9ajlRKtI2GgvhIUj4INxIQYvV9xQh8JjTIW04OyIlZI8VAA2ijYWFEFyeviQ
 VsAqsOkdMWfmxOW7HLk1XOegcYKJhiLMhSP1u4MvwW/z05elABy41hFJ93m7rU7cmTIy
 /5CQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-language;
 bh=Eok/pRUDxOyegPNqDHCR2CwWhYD/7Jscocl2BZOG7q8=;
 b=D1RVpLflFM2TIU+Io++XGe+pXeO+K+t/yfoGhXjD4htYahPKBjXKlxptNsQRgolfCV
 WQp99TV50YW7Vud0XMmJJsCpDj3jWQU6mGURY5dtSCBITPecnEKAbzrp5tdrJbNA0Xn0
 2MmauB11NihmxqQgeiRpmk7/ZWRDsj2J2dpSCzPdLxRes3UMwQFxvWN2yaqVhxChDdn8
 wMgYkXlIZj1RuhfHwDTuauEJRxnlZt9uxE5d4BVTxjYMLT8X7E5X4/27l451J+5Gh7k9
 +Bewe/TYwXFEkJ7X2quL3VK0yYpPtH0yNaf/AsgseBHlgpc1dWv9GuVFZCLaEUoebULK
 3FPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VIPchsIJzYYmsViVmtKARwXJUkPZN1Cq6NLKc9yJX+2oK3jXq
 n+V5GEj1viy/hTOoe1WG00mO+he3Z/87sQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkFwjFjRcpv19zYKSD2/7u7STbu8ZOrXJ/pEMMzLvNs5qwNApjSeor4yjQ3vzRfkUGkuyrKw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:db43:: with SMTP id
 u3mr6835200pjx.235.1606511879522; 
 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net.
 [167.179.176.9])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j19sm8284690pff.74.2020.11.27.13.17.57
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:17:58 -0800 (PST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <930e1177-6137-aa49-718c-04f4fa74e975@lirmm.fr>
 <3e7c42b6-1a1f-d296-e240-fb98cf87a6ca@gmail.com>
 <47b5a337-b2ca-ce6d-37c5-e904db8d6e03@univ-fcomte.fr>
 <843b2e4d-ff82-bbdd-6906-8e6ff90bcc96@odiso.com>
From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4f70ac8b-ac80-c852-c5d5-9a9254e184bd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 07:17:56 +1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <843b2e4d-ff82-bbdd-6906-8e6ff90bcc96@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -1.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 KAM_LINKBAIT3             1.5 Freemail linkbait with a url shortener
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 KAM_SHORT               0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [ceph.io]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Python problem with upgrade to proxmoxVE6.3/ CEPH
 Nautilus 14.2.15
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 21:18:03 -0000

On 28/11/2020 2:59 am, alexandre derumier wrote:
> you can't reduce PG on nautilus,  only since octopus.  (and ceph is 
> able to do it automataaly with new pg autoscaler)


Actually you can, has been the case since Nautilus.


https://ceph.io/rados/new-in-nautilus-pg-merging-and-autotuning/


-- 
Lindsay