From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9751970F91
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:33:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 903A145C2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:33:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2EFFD4597
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:33:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0A9EB4316C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:33:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4d8f7a57-1f0b-c511-d680-53a72d88a2b6@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:33:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220428084449.144884-1-m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
 <20220428084449.144884-3-m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
 <f8482163-7da2-64b8-147b-b598d7cde972@proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <f8482163-7da2-64b8-147b-b598d7cde972@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.625 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A             -1.1 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 1/1] Warn in GUI for unlikely
 iothread config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:33:39 -0000

Am 10.05.22 um 09:26 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> Am 28.04.22 um 10:44 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
>> Previously, only a plaintext line in the task log showed something was off.
>> Now, the GUI will show it as a warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>
>> ---
> 
> Note: requires a dependency bump for libpve-common-perl (it's currently
> at 7.1-3 but the static log_warn was added just after that).
> 
> And it fixes #3890 :)
> 

Also missing a
use PVE::RESTEnvironment;