From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6933968725 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5756D8CCE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3B8968CB0 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id a23-20020a05600c2257b0290236ec98bebaso1480845wmm.1 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA9XZZlkkYr6VIw75jrwqQXA/xRmZgZVutvsSa3bpW4=; b=Xul6BAxYU2tVerLCHOiJ8+zxynCJEiowYSDan53oQectnAvo6eUsqnB85anRMB9VfO Kiq/+Iil/9UUHkyteH7zCs9dG3/URyfq/t36TcQgUUUClMcHbABDn602CA9+knPm4qGt xMku6k6p4UiNcFxXS47IbIz3+NDNFcBclMBWpXXvMHJ3aFIjeLgoi7t1rXgCQjkGzcpG yQxG0He9dM1SzeYh+EkJKdJi3JVksfWvuVElUN+ijGwwtGH0z4OLFisrCPM+YtuCFw// Vqh4/muqZ0bCSi8buoweigdw3rzOFp7cJUXvkgqywoHxqSXHRv8fX8Xi8EjL8AL8imW8 XIhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA9XZZlkkYr6VIw75jrwqQXA/xRmZgZVutvsSa3bpW4=; b=WZ1+9LzX6SYMnr8Pi9ht8Aqc55s95MqGAAtSCZOiz27bSZ+AteseUNfKIKdLfgbchr l+rVvaCwgO2ZoduOV7/5PZN9kWGKt0Lkdtpk7rXUQRVqUnqHldMMa9Ebld46+HZl/LVo bk7PYIR6tGd7a89zmqTa7/6e8CHFkNgatfJuBkMH0IiudvBj9C07JnGJBC/YfS3zegay f4zhbfScAk7Ip5KUlrJ0UEGfxReU89d8WvloiJmCqCPDFlyTVMFHcfr5Vv4LlRDH6YwO k1MfTi6tswqGwWaeON/TZdTCGTZSxJITl0fnOQyhRKv6qi3JWI55+fQ5P/y1bHAcKYFj Ma1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xbl+dRXRuc08JRoS2AMamyr2w9PeF+kWUOEyFxWeqZjn26EaT i0AteyIIrT8rkYMz9IHwjQlvdvrHfv4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyehL2EfrSgH0/YO9L/G0/was0E5hjHp32rDrGIot498AqdLESnskUsSfI4lWBqpwn4AMl11Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7fc5:: with SMTP id a188mr39540847wmd.133.1626890749868; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm526065wmg.46.2021.07.21.11.05.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com> References: <aba0941b-f9e0-6019-28e8-a4c3de11477e@gmail.com> <CAOKSTBtL9q8ttnxEV8ZtTzNXQp4vRNL7dcqVZ=6iQQ=7O0ZuSw@mail.gmail.com> <d4ee20fa-93ae-1c64-8855-411c7f337fbc@gmail.com> <CAOKSTBuikM5sdbWPjnZm7L79-aGZ+5fLHxJNM5hxkbwkJhS1ig@mail.gmail.com> <40e4e0a8-837e-5e1c-da40-e5119fbe49fd@gmail.com> <4bf73e157ec602e65f73bf1b16efd5dd56ed0bb0.camel@odiso.com> From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4d3b11b5-9e1a-5422-9d3c-b10d95fb4b5d@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4bf73e157ec602e65f73bf1b16efd5dd56ed0bb0.camel@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.524 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:06:28 -0000 Am 21.07.21 um 19:58 schrieb alexandre derumier: > slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 > > ----> > > bond-slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 Thank you, that's it. > > > ("slaves" is deprecated since years, and ifupdown2 don't support it) Well, even the documentation for Buster still mentions "slaves" so it cannot be deprecated for that long. Regards, Uwe > > > Le mercredi 21 juillet 2021 à 19:31 +0200, Uwe Sauter a écrit : >> No, the bond isn't created on system boot. Thus the bridge that should connect the bond with the VMs >> is created but the connection is not made. >> >> >> Am 21.07.21 um 18:41 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: >>> So did you solve the issue? >>> --- >>> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >>> (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:49, Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>>> escreveu: >>> >>> Hi Gilberto, >>> >>> thanks for that tip. Unfortunately the network configuration quits a few steps before the >>> bridge is >>> configured. The needed bond0 is not created… >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> >>> Am 21.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: >>> > Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface file: >>> > >>> > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change> >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change>> >>> > <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change> >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change >>> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change>>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > --- >>> > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >>> > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:18, Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>> >>> > <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com >>> <mailto:uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>>>> escreveu: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. >>> > >>> > It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces using LCAP. >>> > >>> > Output from "ip a": >>> > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 >>> > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 >>> > inet 127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8>> <http://127.0.0.1/8 >>> <http://127.0.0.1/8> <http://127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8>>> scope >>> host lo >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > inet6 ::1/128 scope host >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master vmbr1224 state UP >>> group default >>> > qlen 1000 >>> > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > altname enp24s0f0 >>> > 3: enp59s0f4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default >>> qlen 1000 >>> > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > 4: enp59s0f4d1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default >>> qlen 1000 >>> > link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > 5: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 >>> > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > altname enp24s0f1 >>> > 6: ibp94s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >>> > link/infiniband 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd >>> > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > 7: ibp94s0d1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >>> > link/infiniband 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd >>> > 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > 8: vmbr1224: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group >>> default >>> > qlen 1000 >>> > link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>> > inet 10.224.203.1/16 <http://10.224.203.1/16 <http://10.224.203.1/16>> >>> <http://10.224.203.1/16 <http://10.224.203.1/16> >>> <http://10.224.203.1/16 <http://10.224.203.1/16>>> scope global vmbr1224 >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link >>> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>> > >>> > >>> > My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges for the VMs: >>> > auto lo >>> > iface lo inet loopback >>> > >>> > auto eno1 >>> > iface eno1 inet manual >>> > >>> > auto enp59s0f4 >>> > iface enp59s0f4 inet manual >>> > mtu 9000 >>> > >>> > auto enp59s0f4d1 >>> > iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual >>> > mtu 9000 >>> > >>> > auto bond0 >>> > iface bond0 inet manual >>> > slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 >>> > bond-downdelay 200 >>> > bond-miimon 100 >>> > bond-mode 802.3ad >>> > bond-updelay 200 >>> > >>> > auto vmbr1224 >>> > iface vmbr1224 inet static >>> > address 10.224.203.1 >>> > netmask 255.255.0.0 >>> > gateway 10.224.200.1 >>> > bridge_ports eno1 >>> > bridge_stp off >>> > bridge_fd 0 >>> > >>> > ## # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 >>> > ## auto vmbr155 >>> > ## iface vmbr155 inet manual >>> > ## mtu 9000 >>> > ## bridge_ports bond0 >>> > ## bridge_stp off >>> > ## bridge_fd 0 >>> > >>> > >>> > This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same host which experienced >>> a SSD >>> > failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. >>> > >>> > >>> > Am I missing something? Am I being blind? >>> > >>> > >>> > Any help is appreciated. >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Uwe >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > pve-user mailing list >>> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>> >>> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>> <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>>> >>> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user> >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>> >>> > <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user> >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user> >