From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6740D692AD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:04:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5417F26F18
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:04:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9317026F09
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 56C2144780;
 Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4cb89cf1-21db-794c-bf7c-39fe2b8ff569@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:03:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Serge Logvinov <serge.logvinov@gmail.com>
Cc: Serge Logvinov <serge.logvinov@sinextra.dev>
References: <20210910183343.69805-1-serge.logvinov@sinextra.dev>
 <20210910183343.69805-2-serge.logvinov@sinextra.dev>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210910183343.69805-2-serge.logvinov@sinextra.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 2.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -3.584 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container 1/1] feat: set hostname to meta
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:04:34 -0000

On 10.09.21 20:33, Serge Logvinov wrote:
> Add hostname property in meta-data (nocloud method).
> Now only user-data has hostname of VM. If you redifine user-data, you lost the hostname.
> 

First, thanks for your contribution!

Before incorporating patches from you we'd need a signed CLA sent to office@proxmox.com
For more details about that see our Developer Documentation:
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation#Software_License_and_Copyright

cheers,
Thomas