From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA8F1FF170 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 386713E7BE; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4841fc8f-efd0-464f-9451-2bcdc8b544c9@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:01:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Daniel Herzig , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20250721152734.230940-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Friedrich Weber In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753369313523 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.012 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] pvecm, network: add section on corosync over bonds X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Thanks for taking a look at this! On 24/07/2025 10:22, Daniel Herzig wrote: > Thanks for documenting this! > > I'd even go one step further and discourage the use of bonds in one of > the sections of 'Cluster Network' in `pvecm.adoc` as well. Best with a > link to the new 'Corosync over Bonds' section, with your decent > explanation. That way it would be more difficult to miss for hasty > readers (which would be a pity). Actually, now that I think about it, maybe the "Corosync over Bonds" section would be better placed as a subsection under "Cluster Networks", seems a bit weird to have it under "Requirements". I'll try it out and send a v2. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel