From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310A91FF0AB for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D2022157A; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4680ba6c-fd9e-47b3-b3b7-cc4ee97fca14@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:05:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH manager] 8to9: adapt to changed signature of get_vm_machine() From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260129132623.127384-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260129132623.127384-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790154359254 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.516 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: ZNLFLP4ROF4K3CSUUJV3APA3OTZMBIH5 X-Message-ID-Hash: ZNLFLP4ROF4K3CSUUJV3APA3OTZMBIH5 X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 29.01.26 um 2:25 PM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > The signature change in qemu-server does not lead to any breakage, > because the function still looks at $conf->{arch}. Still, it should be > adapted. > > Reported-by: Thomas Lamprecht > Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner > --- > > Dependency bump for qemu-server needed! Ping. Still applies and the bump is already covered now :) > > PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm b/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm > index 0c4b2343..662ee943 100644 > --- a/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm > +++ b/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm > @@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ my sub check_qemu_machine_versions { > my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid); > > # first, actually configured machine version > - my $machine_type = PVE::QemuServer::Machine::get_vm_machine($conf, undef, $conf->{arch}); > + my $machine_type = PVE::QemuServer::Machine::get_vm_machine($conf); > if ( > PVE::QemuServer::Machine::extract_version($machine_type) # no version means latest > && !PVE::QemuServer::Machine::is_machine_version_at_least($machine_type, @baseline) > @@ -942,9 +942,7 @@ my sub check_qemu_machine_versions { > # second, if hibernated, running machine version > if ($conf->{vmstate}) { > my $machine_type = PVE::QemuServer::Machine::get_vm_machine( > - $conf, > - $conf->{runningmachine}, > - $conf->{arch}, > + $conf, $conf->{runningmachine}, > ); > if ( > PVE::QemuServer::Machine::extract_version($machine_type) # no version means latest > @@ -964,7 +962,6 @@ my sub check_qemu_machine_versions { > my $machine_type = PVE::QemuServer::Machine::get_vm_machine( > $snap_conf, > $snap_conf->{runningmachine}, > - $snap_conf->{arch}, > ); > if ( # no version means latest > PVE::QemuServer::Machine::extract_version($machine_type)