From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A5A1FF13B for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 522D0AB5F; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 14:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4575af8e-2a76-4571-9c9b-70b8b649927b@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 14:28:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup 5/6] datastore: open datastores with WriteNonExpanding instead of Write To: Robert Obkircher , pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260602130001.217482-1-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> <20260602130001.217482-11-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Christian Ebner In-Reply-To: <20260602130001.217482-11-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780489687494 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.069 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: ZRUXAZ7RWFX2SJKZF2IIJZM7ZTK2CDP5 X-Message-ID-Hash: ZRUXAZ7RWFX2SJKZF2IIJZM7ZTK2CDP5 X-MailFrom: c.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 6/2/26 3:00 PM, Robert Obkircher wrote: > Allow reclaim and garbage-collection jobs when the GarbageCollection > maintenance mode is active. Only include the most important operations > for now. Others, such as set_backup_owner and group/namespace moves, > could be reasonably supported as well. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Obkircher Reviewed-by: Christian Ebner