From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7992607FA
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE722F976
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id ECB7AF969
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id k1so2019453eds.13
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=reply-to:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=hidslmaFMEDmeXFoYCkptRugX7zZgYwbFEJu9wtxh5g=;
 b=PI74s9FId0ooEIg7uAZf8H7PBR1OHtorDK2bWvKOI/hD+KmESNhkrw4nbQvEDHuVdd
 hGagsda6EQ5vme+g7bmmSXszxBrfI+mEmgNmdnoUCaIFNjYUnWB5Ff6J0AeAvcWF92Jx
 Ks3epgVXDgug1twKErqFpxuxRw0+vVj9ZzTDwR6Zchp1qgBJOjEtrCr+QuH7S/u7N11P
 FdD4cUMOf2A9TP5MtqzMy6o0uKgfGE0D7v0wZWCvf/6g1yDSzdp+da7heDyfE8dT9ehr
 pvJGC9rFlpBGEyyfgSEbD6UuS/EbUmJP/l59WfPletdnvAXL+5wBdtSkkvewr5dEs5qA
 qWyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:to:from:subject:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=hidslmaFMEDmeXFoYCkptRugX7zZgYwbFEJu9wtxh5g=;
 b=r2IdFrBC6a+ju2OGEvRuvJYx333BcRUK40DOjVUzBNeoudwdR0shdDZIuKc2Ejq60p
 /3u1+IaZ4iJjeqqV5mZZdzdC1zhhQ34z/ljRQkCw4LCMxBcxrjcueRHE7vT3ZZn36r43
 uWQPt4zdXFc7gOOuz77dGeBLnfIXdXRaCliVKKMVTC9ec50wrphboHppXu0kBHdX4gkI
 EMdxAuDH6rdL+jHnMilTaJsYR2CG+/F6Nr9gc9qcEZRi/qdv74T3lT8QOHMoPjhRkAnO
 EKk7/2tpudFElF/ktp6Vga1jcrJUWX4rpMqkREUvHqEaQl+otym7YtQ7OBMn3o7QizBk
 9Ysw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530j8A3dCYwgjdEpepuMR3zWTYkbzAsTFK93hiHxXNTKtGJGNTwy
 aK3JIFk2LnimMo1sEHvvuIsqEQT9sd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzPpF4YKsb3WzJaHwtenwStz+H1Bn3ovQ3KCSn6Wo0hiSLu/H3eFtki5pDNzjl/qw7NcbYdQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:da08:: with SMTP id z8mr2237701edj.170.1606393081516; 
 Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680?
 ([2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r25sm2937553eji.8.2020.11.26.04.18.00
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [PVE-User] Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's
 updates
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:18:39 -0000

Hi all,

this is a warning for all that are eager to apply today's updates.
In my case the ceph-mon@<host> service did not start after a reboot which caused a hanging Ceph once the second monitoring service
went offline.

Make sure to check ceph-mon@<host>.service is running on freshly started hosts before rebooting the next host with a monitoring
service.

Regards,

	Uwe