From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D72C7228A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:37:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D8062BC6B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:36:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6E6C92BC60
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:36:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3546842BC6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:36:31 +0200 (CEST)
To: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210413082414.32241-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <78d32c42-cb8e-49e8-66e3-590669333fd5@proxmox.com>
 <a75d77bf-f293-b712-a8bf-f95fd316f69d@proxmox.com>
 <4d66d415-ef78-e3c7-2469-59b93ee37c6b@proxmox.com>
From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <434345c4-8608-5fd4-5955-5285bc394ec7@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:36:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4d66d415-ef78-e3c7-2469-59b93ee37c6b@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.070 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.489 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [qemuserver.pm, proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server] avoid setting lun number for
 drives when pvscsi controller is used
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:37:02 -0000

On 6/15/21 10:04 AM, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Am 14.06.21 um 11:15 schrieb Stefan Reiter:
>> On 6/14/21 8:29 AM, Fabian Ebner wrote:
>>> Any feedback for this?
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me and works as advertised:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
>> Tested-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
>>
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
>> The `$unit = $drive->{index} % maxdev` logic doesn't seem useful here
>> though, I
>> think it's a copy/paste from the IDE/SATA code below (it was already
>> used before
>> this patch). How about this for a cleanup on top:
>>   >
>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> index c00bde1..afd47b5 100644
>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> @@ -1424,7 +1424,6 @@ sub print_drivedevice_full {
>>        } elsif ($drive->{interface} eq 'scsi') {
>>
>>        my ($maxdev, $controller, $controller_prefix) =
>> scsihw_infos($conf, $drive);
>> -    my $unit = $drive->{index} % $maxdev;
> 
> 
> Using LSI 53C895A controller and 9 disks I get
> 
>       kvm: -device
> scsi-hd,bus=scsihw1.0,scsi-id=8,drive=drive-scsi8,id=scsi8: bad scsi
> device id: 8
> 
> As long as scsihw_infos returns the correct thing, I don't see a problem
> sticking to the modular arithmetic ;)
> 

Ah yes, the LSI ones get a new controller every 8 drives, and with pvscsi
$maxdev is 256 anyway... alright, ignore this then :)

>>        my $devicetype = 'hd';
>>        my $path = '';
>>        if (drive_is_cdrom($drive)) {
>> @@ -1452,7 +1451,7 @@ sub print_drivedevice_full {
>>        }
>>
>>        if (!$conf->{scsihw} || $conf->{scsihw} =~ m/^lsi/ ||
>> $conf->{scsihw} eq 'pvscsi') {
>> -       $device =
>> "scsi-$devicetype,bus=$controller_prefix$controller.0,scsi-id=$unit";
>> +       $device =
>> "scsi-$devicetype,bus=$controller_prefix$controller.0,scsi-id=$drive->{index}";
>>
>>        } else {
>>           $device =
>> "scsi-$devicetype,bus=$controller_prefix$controller.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0"
>>               .",lun=$drive->{index}";
>>
>>
>>> Am 13.04.21 um 10:24 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
>>>> Reported in the community forum[0].
>>>>
>>>> In QEMU's hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c in the SCSIBusInfo struct, the max_lun
>>>> property
>>>> is set to 0. This means that in our stack, one cannot have multiple
>>>> disks and
>>>> use 'scsihw: pvscsi' currently, as kvm would fail with
>>>>        bad scsi device lun: 1
>>>>
>>>> Instead of increasing the lun number, increase the scsi-id, as we
>>>> already do for
>>>> lsi.* (in hw/scsi/lsi53c895a.c the max_lun property is also 0).
>>>>
>>>> [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/kvm-bad-scsi-device-lun-1.84318/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I'm not experienced in this area, so not at all sure if this is the
>>>> proper
>>>> solution/workaround.
>>>>
>>>>     PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +-
>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>> index fdb2ac9..4ce663b 100644
>>>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>>>> @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ sub print_drivedevice_full {
>>>>             }
>>>>         }
>>>> -    if (!$conf->{scsihw} || ($conf->{scsihw} =~ m/^lsi/)){
>>>> +    if (!$conf->{scsihw} || $conf->{scsihw} =~ m/^lsi/ ||
>>>> $conf->{scsihw} eq 'pvscsi') {
>>>>             $device =
>>>> "scsi-$devicetype,bus=$controller_prefix$controller.0,scsi-id=$unit";
>>>>         } else {
>>>>             $device =
>>>> "scsi-$devicetype,bus=$controller_prefix$controller.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pve-devel mailing list
>>> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
>>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>>
>>>