From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B511FF141 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 14:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 112BE58C9; Tue, 19 May 2026 14:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4321bcaf-dc50-4aad-9684-9dfe4fa16d57@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 14:27:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: applied: [PATCH manager] pve8to9: avoid logging failure when old kernel metapackages are not installed To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260519085148.42853-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <177919313632.1121963.6885264919205134776.b4-ty@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <177919313632.1121963.6885264919205134776.b4-ty@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779193663067 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: U52YS2LKWPQEMEQVT5FCWW4XZYLC75EU X-Message-ID-Hash: U52YS2LKWPQEMEQVT5FCWW4XZYLC75EU X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 19.05.26 um 2:19 PM schrieb Fabian Grünbichler: > > On Tue, 19 May 2026 10:50:06 +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> Since the $noerr parameter was not passed along, the get_pkg >> subroutine would log a failure when it couldn't determine the >> installed package version for old kernel metapackages, e.g.: >>> FAIL: unable to determine installed pve-kernel-6.5 version. >> >> > > Applied to master and stable-8, thanks! In stable-8, $get_pkg() does not have the $noerr argument yet.