From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7658473A6C for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:11:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 636402DDAB for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:11:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1582D2DD8D for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A585740EA9 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42fc9647-e5f9-a3da-6ec4-92b1b8a1cc28@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:10:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Victor Hooi <victorhooi@yahoo.com>, PVE development discussion <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> References: <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g.ref@mail.gmail.com> <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g@mail.gmail.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMnnoUK8KCAANZfav37or8t0f-hBRi2w32QVsb1n4V=siMnE8g@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.506 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Proxmox 7.0 beta to 7.0-8 - Now unable to start VM - cgroup isn't numeric? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 10:11:18 -0000 Hi, On 07.07.21 11:44, Victor Hooi wrote: > I recently upgraded from the Proxmox 7.0 beta, to the latest 7.0-8 release. > > However, when I try to start a Windows VM that I created before, I now get > the following error: > > Argument "cgroup v1: 1024, cgroup v2: 100" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) >> at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/QemuServer.pm line 5312. >> TASK ERROR: start failed: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.InvalidArgs: Value >> specified in CPUWeight is out of range > > > Did something change between the beta and the release? Is there any way to > fix the above? A qemu-server version with a regression made it to the pvetest repository just a bit ago, fixed now with qemu-server 7.0-9 that super seeded it.