From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257A77439D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:22:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1BC521A59E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:22:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11D721A585
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:22:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B33440C70
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:22:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3fd5d90e-1369-618d-5926-6e4ca6ffa186@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:22:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210618105938.57107-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20210618105938.57107-7-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210618105938.57107-7-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.719 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage 1/2] vdisk_list: only scan
 storages with the correct content type(s)
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:22:56 -0000

On 18.06.21 12:59, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> The enabled check in the lower loop is now redundant and can be removed.
> 
> If storeid is provided, initialize the result hash accordingly, mainly for
> backwards compatibility (needed by a caller in pve-manager's Ceph/Pools.pm and
> the migration code in pve-container and qemu-server), but it also is less
> surprising in general.
> 
> Remaining vdisk_list users that do not specify a content type are:
>     1. pve-manager's Pool/Ceph.pm, but the content type for RBD can only be
>        rootdir and images, so the storage is scanned (if enabled, same as
>        before).
>     2. pve-container migration
>     3. qemu-server migration
> For the latter two, it's planned to enforce content type, so the change is fine
> too.
> 
> This also means that for iscsi(direct) plugins with content type 'none', i.e.
> "use LUNs directly" does not return the list of images anymore, but that was
> rather a bug anyways as they're not virtual disks then:
>     0.0.0.scsi-36001405b8f2772e13a04b8e9390db13d
> All of the remaining callers not using content types (see above) are fine with
> that change too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Breaks old migration behavior when there are unused/unreferenced/vmstate volumes
> on a misconfigured storage!
> 
>  PVE/Storage.pm | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!