From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB31C71C02 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 09:44:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC8EBFA88 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 09:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6420AFA6F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 09:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 39B4A42D06 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 May 2022 09:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3e3cd22c-bcf3-e7db-f063-7e1cd4a3f63f@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 09:43:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/101.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20220518090454.2431000-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20220518090454.2431000-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [rbdplugin.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH v2 storage] rbd: fix #4060 show data-pool usage when configured X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 07:44:15 -0000 On 18/05/2022 11:04, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > When a data-pool is configured, use it for status infos. The 'data-pool' > config option is used to mark the erasure coded pool while the 'pool' > will be the replicated pool holding meta data such as the omap. > > This means, the 'pool' will only use a small amount of space and people > are interested how much they can store in the erasure coded pool anyway. > > Therefore this patch reorders the assignment of the used pool name by > availability of the scfg parameters: data-pool -> pool -> fallback 'rbd' > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> > --- > changes: instead of two lines and if conditions, use the // parameter > multiple times > > PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!