From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4CE8DB8B for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:47:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BF2501DD10 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:46:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:46:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0501443008 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:46:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3cb5735e-61b4-00d1-aa2d-5a16bf3a6234@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:46:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/107.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com> References: <20221109115828.137770-1-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> <20221109115828.137770-6-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20221109115828.137770-6-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 05/10] move installation options to advanced folder X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:47:13 -0000 Am 09/11/2022 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Heiserer: > @Thomas The screenshot still shows the PVE6 menu. > Do you want to update that yourself, or should I send you the up-to-date screeshot? please place such meta question/info not in the commit message itself but.. > Signed-off-by: Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com> > --- -> here, where it's visible on review but ignored by git. Anyhow, I'll look into updating those myself for the upcoming point release, thx for pointing out tough (and you may remember me if I forget, while not critical its nice to have it in sync)