From: David Riley <d.riley@proxmox.com>
To: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-common 1/2] certificate: add helpers for lifetime-based ACME renewal
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:17:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a8341b3-452c-4f12-b1e4-f2d7b8615b42@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM69TSMMNTVT.RVQXMFWI4Q0A@proxmox.com>
On 10/16/26 2:45 PM, Michael Köppl wrote:
> On Tue Oct 6, 2026 at 2:31 PM CEST, David Riley wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> +sub get_cert_renew_lead_time {
>> + my ($cert_path) = @_;
>> +
>> + my $default_lead = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60;
>> +
>> + my $not_before = get_not_before_as_epoch($cert_path);
>> + my $not_after = get_expiration_as_epoch($cert_path);
>> +
>> + my $lifetime = $not_after - $not_before;
>> + return $default_lead if $lifetime <= 0;
>> +
>> + my $scale = $lifetime < (10 * 24 * 60 * 60) ? 2 : 3;
>> +
>> + return int($lifetime / $scale);
> The scaling mirrors what's done in PBS, but shouldn't this also have
> the 3-day floor that PBS has? AFAICT from the original series, the this
> floor was applied as it was in v1, so as part of the helper function, so
> it should probably also go here.
>
> If I understand Shannon's comment [0] on the original series correctly,
> for short-lived certificates (e.g. 48h) the renewal window (in this case
> 24h) might be shorter than the time between pveupdate runs and renewal
> might fail because of that. I'm able to reproduce this using `faketime`.
>
> Or is there a reason this was ommitted?
>
> [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pbs-devel/DHZKEJBTPLZY.TNSL8CWILFKT@proxmox.com/
>
You are right this should have definitely be included here as well.
Seems like I have missed that part when looking at the pbs series.
Thanks for the heads up, I will correct that in a v2.
>> +}
>> +
>> # Create a CSR and certificate key for a given order
>> # returns path to CSR file or path to CSR and key files
>> sub generate_csr {
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 12:31 [PATCH common/manager 0/2] fix #8006: acme: lifetime-based certificate renewal threshold David Riley
2026-10-06 12:31 ` [PATCH pve-common 1/2] certificate: add helpers for lifetime-based ACME renewal David Riley
2026-10-16 12:45 ` Michael Köppl
2026-10-16 13:17 ` David Riley [this message]
2026-10-06 12:31 ` [PATCH pve-manager 2/2] fix #8006: api: acme: lifetime-based certificate renewal threshold David Riley
2026-10-16 12:45 ` Michael Köppl
2026-10-16 13:17 ` David Riley
2026-10-16 12:45 ` [PATCH common/manager 0/2] fix #8006: " Michael Köppl
2026-10-16 13:17 ` David Riley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a8341b3-452c-4f12-b1e4-f2d7b8615b42@proxmox.com \
--to=d.riley@proxmox.com \
--cc=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.