From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895BD6BCEB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:32:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7D3801B5B8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:32:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 686B21B5A8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:32:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 375A64497C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:32:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <38976d6c-942e-b4e1-c70e-92c2fdef0211@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:32:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20210212155751.16045-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <20210212155751.16045-5-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210212155751.16045-5-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 manager 4/4] ui: qemu/HardwareView:
 fix CDRom permission checkss
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:32:39 -0000

On 12.02.21 16:57, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> There are several types of drives that use the same config keys. Most
> notably CDRom and regular VM disks (EFI and cloudinit exist as well).
> 
> Since there is a dedicated permission for CDRom drives we need to check
> permissions in more detail, depending on what type of drive it actually
> is for things like the edit, remove and Add -> CDRom buttons.
> 
> The permission check in the row definition itself which only checked for
> 'VM.Config.Disk' permissions (never_delete) had to be removed and finer
> grained checks added for the individual buttons. This also meant a bit
> of reshuffling in the checks what kind of disk the current one is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: improved permission checks in the GUI to make sure that CDRom things
> will behave as expected and the other things are kept as is. Meaning all
> other disks (cloudinit, efi, used, unused) still need VM.Config.Disk
> permissions.
> 
> Tested by giving a user only VMAudit and Config.CDRom permissions in the
> one case, and all VM.Config.* permissions except CDRom.
> 
>  www/manager6/qemu/HardwareView.js | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, but prefixed with some further cleanups which result was merged
into this one, so maybe a re-check would be good.
much thanks!