From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dea@corep.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567E990B16
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Mar 2023 13:39:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F25FACED
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Mar 2023 13:38:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.corep.it (mail.corep.it [93.186.252.128])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Mar 2023 13:38:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <37b93c67-fbae-3736-26a2-9ff3af7dc4fd@corep.it>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:38:33 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
From: dea <dea@corep.it>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <7ab47597-6ed5-f577-49b5-c011b67ad1a8@corep.it>
In-Reply-To: <7ab47597-6ed5-f577-49b5-c011b67ad1a8@corep.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.323 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Possible problem on NFS storage with release 2-3-3
 (??)
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 12:39:05 -0000


Hi can confirm !

Downgrade via dpkg from 2.3-3 to 2.3-2 (and change kernel to 6.1) and 
works very fast, as usually.

I don't know if the problem is in the kernel or in the 2.3-3 package, 
but this way it works as it should.

The system is in production, so I can't do too many tests and reboots...

I was exasperated by the slowness, so I made two changes at once (I know 
that diagnostically it's the worst solution, but not having time or a 
way to give too much disruption I couldn't do one test at a time).

Luca