From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459EF1FF170 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:54:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C97128972; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:54:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3584b07f-92b7-4cf6-a0f4-6adf7f5752d6@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:53:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion , Lukas Wagner References: <20250821095319.134215-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20250821095319.134215-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1755780811951 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager v6 00/23] metric collection improvements (concurrency, API, CLI) X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" just a first high level question while i'm testing/reviewing this: when using this patch, it seems the collection interval is much reduced? e.g. in the gui I'm missing up to the last 10 minutes now? (at 14:49 the last point i have for the rrd is from 14:40) is this by design? i get that we don't want to pull too often, but showing up to 10minutes out of date graphs is also not practical? my naive solution would be to proxy the rrd requests to the pve nodes directly, but then why would we need the metric collection in the first place? i guess i'm just missing something here, maybe you can point it out for me? _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel