From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E751E1FF15E for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:54:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7D2AE17018; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:54:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <34ee1ade-1fe2-42e1-8646-5103b9947588@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:54:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Markus Frank References: <20251110114032.125526-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20251110114032.125526-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762782841823 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server/pve-manager v1 0/2] add virtio-vga-gl Vulkan (venus) support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 10.11.25 um 12:40 schrieb Markus Frank: > To get an overview of the performance, see the benchmark below. > > supertuxkart (1.5) benchmark (default settings, vulkan, 1024x768): > > Host result (Granite Ridge integrated GPU): > * Total frame count: 8488 > * Total profiling time (ms): 38139 > * Steady FPS: 92 > * Mostly stable FPS: 137 > * Typical FPS: 194 > > VM (host, 4 core, 8GiB) with venus (hostmem=8192M) result: > * Total frame count: 3321 > * Total profiling time (ms): 38130 > * Steady FPS: 58 > * Mostly stable FPS: 75 > * Typical FPS: 86 > Comparing with a benchmark in the VM with other displays would be also nice. Most interesting would be the default (vga IIRC) and qxl (SPICE). > This benchmark showed no significant differences in performance between > the various memory window sizes for venus. I probably would not expose them then for now. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel