From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972BF9285D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:26:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7787F1A40A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:26:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:26:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 90E1744A0F;
 Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:26:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <314ce1fb-3a40-2d23-0576-a49b74b57487@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:26:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:106.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/106.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
References: <20221014072235.2902517-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221014072235.2902517-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.035 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH ifupdown2] add ovs support for
 fakebridge.
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:26:39 -0000

Am 14/10/2022 um 09:22 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
> This was request by a proxmox user on ifupdown2 github issues.
> 
> https://github.com/CumulusNetworks/ifupdown2/issues/245
> 
> It was possible to do it with ifupdown1, but not ifupdown2.
> 
> The patch is already applied upstream
> https://github.com/CumulusNetworks/ifupdown2/pull/246
> 
> example to define a fake ovs bridge with vlan10:
> 
> auto vmbr0
> iface vmbr0 inet manual
>         ovs_type OVSBridge
> 
> auto vmbr0v10
> iface vmbr0v10 inet manual
>         ovs_type OVSBridge
>         ovs_bridge vmbr0
>         ovs_options vmbr0 10
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
> ---
>  debian/patches/series                         |  3 +-
>  .../0001-ovs-add-support-for-fakebridge.patch | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 debian/patches/upstream/0001-ovs-add-support-for-fakebridge.patch
> 
>

applied, thanks!

Would be great if upstream would finally do a bump..
https://github.com/CumulusNetworks/ifupdown2/issues/211#issuecomment-1196842942