From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BADD70ED7
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 98FEF22498
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 27DC52248D
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E6AAE43C5E;
Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:23 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <302f24e2-ca2e-01ec-db68-b7d0ceff8021@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com
References: <20220622115206.3295425-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
<20220622115206.3295425-11-aderumier@odiso.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220622115206.3295425-11-aderumier@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.204 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v7 qemu-server 10/10] debian : control : add
a break on pve-manager <= 7.2.4
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:22:24 -0000
Am 22.06.22 um 13:52 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
> ---
> debian/control | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index af258db..eff8165 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -54,6 +54,6 @@ Depends: dbus,
> ${perl:Depends},
> ${shlibs:Depends},
> Recommends: proxmox-backup-file-restore (>= 2.1.9-2)
> -Breaks: pve-ha-manager (<= 3.0-4), pve-manager (<= 6.0-13)
> +Breaks: pve-ha-manager (<= 3.0-4), pve-manager (<= 7.2-4)
Is there any special reason for this? What exactly breaks?
What's important is that new pve-manager on the target (which is what
the migration patch tests for - needs to be adapted to the proper
version when applying of course) implies new qemu-server on the target
(so it can parse the new section correctly). And that is done via a
normal dependency bump pve-manger -> qemu-server.
> Description: Qemu Server Tools
> This package contains the Qemu Server tools used by Proxmox VE