From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F431FF137 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2026 15:55:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 60D1822087; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:55:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <30223815-f3b5-4b80-95bd-27fff44fdb68@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:55:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH-SERIES qemu/qemu-server 0/3] api: machines: allow querying machines for a given architecture To: Fiona Ebner , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260129141132.163858-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20260129141132.163858-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1770130474954 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: OR36UGEFSQEDTM7QJJQZZ5FJ6PGFRBEL X-Message-ID-Hash: OR36UGEFSQEDTM7QJJQZZ5FJ6PGFRBEL X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: LGTM, gui support for this should be only a couple of lines, I'd send that when this (or a subsequent version) gets applied. Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak Tested-by: Dominik Csapak On 1/29/26 3:10 PM, Fiona Ebner wrote: > If the QEMU package doesn't ship the file yet, the call for aarch64 > will just fail, but since ARM host support is just starting out, that > seems acceptable. > > The patch introducing the pve-qm-cpu-arch standard option is a > resubmission of the one from the series for CPU types: > https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260129131021.118199-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/ > > qemu: > > Fiona Ebner (1): > buildsys: generate list of supported aarch64 machines during package > build > > debian/parse-machines.pl | 2 +- > debian/rules | 9 +++++++-- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > qemu-server: > > Fiona Ebner (2): > cpu config: introduce pve-qm-cpu-arch standard option for virtual CPU > architecture > api: machines: allow querying machines for a given architecture > > src/PVE/API2/Qemu/Machine.pm | 12 +++++++++--- > src/PVE/QemuServer.pm | 7 +------ > src/PVE/QemuServer/CPUConfig.pm | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > Summary over all repositories: > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >