From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8893B689CB
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:22:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 76D1D22409
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:21:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 110EE223FE
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:21:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C809A447F7
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:21:43 +0100 (CET)
To: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20201230171539.7644-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
 <20201230171539.7644-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <2f6f94c5-c7bc-85b4-05bc-f9b0dd51a680@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:21:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/85.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201230171539.7644-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.051 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.237 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/4] add helper for parsing SA
 channel.d files
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:22:14 -0000

On 30.12.20 18:15, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> RHEL/CentOS based SpamAssassin implementations ship an update script,
> which reads shell snippets from
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/*.conf and uses the information there
> to update SA rules from the configured channels [0].
>=20
> Noticed the existence of this directory/mechanism while reading the
> announcement of the updatechannel for the KAM ruleset [1].
>=20
> Parsing the file as text, instead of sourcing it in a shell, since I
> hope that the channel files distributed don't rely on running commands
> to get the ruleset url and gpg key.

I'd like to have a, at least minimal, test for new parsers. Ideally a OK =
one and
problematic one per success or error condition, respectively.